Since we’re in
the middle of selecting candidates for president of our United States, I
thought it would be interesting to write about the first congress woman,
Jeannette Rankin, a Republican, who was elected in 1916 to the House of
Representatives representing Montana’s District 1.
Rankin was born
June 11, 1880 in Missoula County, Montana before it had become a state. Her parents
were Olive Pickering and John Rankin, a Scottish-Canadian immigrant who worked
as a carpenter and rancher. She was the eldest of six children which included
five girls (one of whom died in childhood) and one brother, Wellington. Her
brother would become Montana’s attorney general, and later, an associate
justice of the Montana Supreme Court. Her parents were progressive thinkers who
encouraged their children to believe they could do whatever they set their
minds to without considering the narrow gender roles society had set for them.
After Rankin
graduated from the University of Montana and the New York School of
Philanthropy (now there’s a degree I never heard of.), she turned down three
marriage proposals, worked for a short time as a social worker, dressmaker, and
furniture designer before she became active in the national effort to win women
the vote. In 1914, she returned to Montana to continue her efforts because she
believed pioneer conditions had created greater respect for women’s work and
abilities in the west which made it easier to convince men to grant women more
equal status. Western states like Wyoming and Colorado had already approved
women’s suffrage years before, and Rankin’s leadership helped Montana join them
in 1914.
Once the vote
for women was secured, Rankin put Montana’s new political climate to the test.
She ran for one of Montana’s two seats in Congress as a Progressive Republican
in 1916. With strong support from both women and men, Rankin became the first
woman in history elected to congress. Her brother, Wellington, an influential
Republican, financed her campaign and was her most avid supporter.
When she
traveled to Washington, D.C. the following year, the nation watched to see if a
woman could handle the responsibilities of high office. Rankin soon proved she
could, but she also demonstrated that she would not betray her own strongly
held political convictions. A dedicated pacifist, Rankin’s first vote as a U.S.
congresswoman was to vote against the U.S. entry into World War I. Many
supported her courageous stand, while others claimed her vote showed women were
incapable of shouldering the difficult burdens of national leadership—despite
the fact that 55 men had also voted against the war. Even President Woodrow
Wilson had resisted involving the country in World War I. It is said, after
delivering his speech to congress asking for a declaration of war, that he
wept. And yet, a woman’s vote against the war was criticized.
Rankin’s vote
against WWI contributed to her defeat in her 1918 reelection bid. For the next
20 years, she continued to work for the cause of peace. Rankin remained active
and committed to other issues of the day as well. On June 8, 1917, the
Speculator Mine disaster in Butte left 168 miners dead, and a massive protest
strike over working conditions followed. Rankin attempted to intervene, but
mining companies refused to meet with her or the miners, and proposed
legislation was unsuccessful.
By 1918, women
had been granted some form of voting rights in about forty states, but Rankin
became a driving force in the movement for unrestricted universal rights. In
January 1918 she opened a congressional debate on a Constitutional amendment
granting universal suffrage to women. The resolution passed in the House, but
was defeated by the Senate. However, a similar resolution passed both chambers
in 1919. After ratification by three-fourths of the states, it became the
Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Her affirmative vote on
the original House resolution made Rankin, as she later noted, "... the
only woman who ever voted to give women the right to vote."
During Rankin's
term, the Montana state legislature voted to replace the state's two at-large
seats with two separate districts. Rankin ended up in the overwhelmingly
Democratic western district. With such a slim chance of retaining her House
seat after the reapportionment, she opted to run for the Senate in 1918. After
losing the Republican primary to Oscar M. Lanstrum, she accepted the nomination
of the National Party, and finished third in the general election behind
incumbent Democrat Thomas J. Walsh and Lanstrum.
In 1924, Rankin
bought a small farm in Georgia where she lived a bare bones existence without
electricity or plumbing. She continued to make frequent speeches around the
country on behalf of the Women's Peace Union and the National Council for the
Prevention of War. In 1928 she founded the Georgia Peace Society, which served
as headquarters for her pacifism campaign until its demise in 1941, just before
the United States entered into World War II.
She also worked
as a field secretary for the National Consumers League, and as a lobbyist for
various pacifist organizations. She supported and argued for the passage of a
Constitutional amendment banning child labor. Rankin supported the
Sheppard–Towner Act, the first federal social welfare program created
explicitly for women and children. The legislation was enacted in 1921 but
repealed just eight years later.
The irony
cannot be missed that, when she again won a seat in the U.S. House of
Representatives in 1940 at age 60, the nation was about to enter World War II.
Following the bombing of Pearl Harbor in December of 1941, Rankin became the
only person in the history of Congress to vote against U.S. entry into both
world wars. This time, though, the dedicated pacifist from Montana cast the
sole dissenting vote. In what I am certain was a very heated debate, it must
have been a courageous act for her to stay committed to her ideals. Rep. (later
Senator) Everett Dirksen, urged her to change her vote to make the resolution
unanimous—or at very least, to abstain—but she refused. "As a woman I
can't go to war," she said, "and I refuse to send anyone else."
I’m pretty sure she was not the most popular member of congress in that moment.
After the vote,
a crowd of reporters pursued Rankin into a cloakroom, where she was forced to
take refuge in a phone booth until Capitol Police arrived to escort her to her
office. There, she was inundated with angry telegrams and phone calls,
including one from her brother, who said, "Montana is 100 percent against
you." A UPI photo of Rankin sequestered in the phone booth, calling for
assistance, appeared the following day in newspapers across the country. While
her action was widely ridiculed in the press, William Allen White, writing in
the Kansas Emporia Gazette, acknowledged her courage in taking it:
Probably a
hundred men in Congress would have liked to do what she did. Not one of them
had the courage to do it. The Gazette entirely disagrees with the wisdom of her
position. But Lord, it was a brave thing! And its bravery someway discounted
its folly. When, in a hundred years from now, courage, sheer courage based upon
moral indignation is celebrated in this country, the name of Jeannette Rankin,
who stood firm in folly for her faith, will be written in monumental bronze,
not for what she did, but for the way she did it.
Two days later,
a similar war declaration against Germany and Italy came to a vote; Rankin
abstained. Her political career effectively over, she retired in 1942 rather
than face near-certain re-election defeat. Asked years later if she had ever
regretted her action, Rankin replied, "Never. If you're against war,
you're against war regardless of what happens. It's a wrong method of trying to
settle a dispute."
In her later
years Rankin traveled the world, frequently visiting India, where she studied
the pacifist teachings of Mahatma Gandhi.
You can well
imagine how the Vietnam War mobilized her once again in her antiwar efforts.
This time, however, she was back by a tremendous movement in the country of pacifists,
feminists, and civil rights advocates. In fact, the new generation found
inspiration from her. In January 1968, the Jeannette Rankin Brigade, a
coalition of women's peace groups, organized an anti-war march in Washington,
D.C.—the largest march by women since the 1913 woman suffrage parade. Rankin
led five thousand participants from Union Station to the steps of the Capitol
Building, where they presented a peace petition to House Speaker John McCormack
of Massachusetts. At the same time, another group of activists from the women's
liberation movement created a protest within the Brigade's protest by staging a
"Burial of True Womanhood" at Arlington National Cemetery to draw
attention to the passive role allotted to women as wives and mothers. In 1972,
Rankin who was in her nineties, considered a third House campaign to gain a
wider audience for her opposition to the Vietnam War, but longstanding throat
and heart ailments forced her to abandon that final project.
Rankin died on
May 18, 1973, age 92, in Carmel, California. She bequeathed her estate,
including the property in Watkinsville, Georgia, to help "mature,
unemployed women workers". The Jeannette Rankin Foundation (now the
Jeannette Rankin Women's Scholarship Fund), a nonprofit organization, awards
annual educational scholarships to low-income women 35 and older across the
United States. Beginning with a single 500-dollar scholarship in 1978, the fund
has since awarded more than $1.8 million in scholarships to more than 700
women.
Rankin's monument in the National Statuary Hall,
Washington, D.C.
Whether we
agree with Rankin’s ideals or not, we have to admire the courage it took for
her to remain true to her principles throughout her life.
Sarah
J. McNeal is a multi-published author of several
genres including time travel, paranormal, western and historical fiction. She
is a retired ER and Critical Care nurse who lives in North Carolina with her
four-legged children, Lily, the Golden Retriever and Liberty, the cat. Besides
her devotion to writing, she also has a great love of music and plays several
instruments including violin, bagpipes, guitar and harmonica. Her books and
short stories may be found at Prairie Rose Publications and its imprints Painted
Pony Books, and Fire Star Press. Some of her fantasy and paranormal books may
also be found at Publishing by Rebecca Vickery and Victory Tales
Press. She welcomes you to her website and social media:
Sarah, a wonderful historic read about an awesome and courageous woman. Your closing statement says it all!
ReplyDeleteCheri, she was truly a woman with courage of her convictions. I don't know if I could have been the only person to vote against war after Pearl Harbor was bombed. It would have felt unpatriotic--and, of course, there was that problem with Hitler and the persecution of Jews including genocide.
DeleteThank you so much for coming and commenting. I appreciate it.
What a fascinating woman, and yes, told in an excellent manner. Good job, Sarah.
ReplyDeleteI read with great interest some of the facts during her career. To be the only person in Congress to vote against both World Wars took a great amount of courage. If there had been FB or International hourly news or Twitter, no doubt the public would have crucified her. As it was in those long-ago-days,few citizens were probably aware of her, let alone how or why she voted as she did.
I liked that she returned to the farm and lived such a basic lifestyle.
She made great decisions, but I would disagree with her stance of never going to war. That only works if the other side agrees, which I'm sure was her lofty goal. But you know Japan nor Germany would never have backed off war. I know we, today, still face these difficult decisions. Thanks.
Celia, ya know, I get it about WWI. It was not a very popular war. Even President W. Wilson didn't want to involve the United States in that war. But WWII was a war where we were attacked, and our allies were in serious trouble. The English were starving by the time the US entered. I would not want to imagine a world in which Hitler ruled. War is a terrible way to solve disputes, but sometimes there are no alternatives.
DeleteI think you're right about the majority of people not realizing how she voted, or maybe even knowing who she was. Today's news media would have run her through a meat grinder of controversy. They are relentless, not to mention, not always accurate or without bias.
I could not have lived as she did with such sparse conveniences--not by choice any way. I like indoor plumbing.
Today's world feels like a complicated place in comparison. I don't always know what the right thing to do is.
I always like your comments, Celia. You put some thought into what you say. Thank you so much for coming by.
Wonderful article! Thank you. I was glad also to learn about the scholarship program and plan to donate.
ReplyDeleteCharlotte, thank you so much for your compliment. Also, thank you for your decision to donate to Rankin's fund. What a gracious and kind thing to do.
DeleteThank you so much for your comment.
You have to admire her resolve to pursue her ideals.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Caroline. No matter what her stance was, she stuck to the convictions of her conscience.
DeleteThank you for coming by today.
I can understand why she stuck to her guns, but unfortunately war seemed the only way out of the situation for our country.
ReplyDeleteMorgan, I know what you mean. Even though I might not have taken the same stance she took, she certainly had courage. It had to take a heap of gumption and determination for her to fight so hard to become the first congresswoman as well.
DeleteThank you so much for dropping in and leaving a comment. I like your name.
Sarah,
ReplyDeleteWhat a fascinating post. Thanks for sharing.
Thank you, Kristy.
DeleteVery inspiring blog, Sarah. Few men in history have had the courage of this woman. Thank you so much for sharing this wonderful story today.
ReplyDeleteVery inspiring blog, Sarah. Few men in history have had the courage of this woman. Thank you so much for sharing this wonderful story today.
ReplyDeleteLinda, women seem to have to work twice as hard as men to gain just equal acclaim. I was glad Jeannette Rankin had such a supportive brother. I didn't find anything written about the rest of their siblings. I kinda wanted to know what they were like, too.
DeleteThank you so much for coming and commenting on my post, Linda. It's always so good to see you.
Sarah, thanks so much for bringing such an amazing woman to life for us. She truly was remarkable in the bold, and steadfast stance she took, maybe not always the right one, but by golly she stood strong in her convictions. I'm not sure many of us today could have withstood the forces she had to deal with. And through all her battles and ridicule, she lives on today through such a worthy cause as the scholarship fund. Great post as always.
ReplyDeleteBev, thank you for all your kind words.
DeleteHonestly, I don't know if I could have done what she had the courage to do, and I have always felt I was a pretty strong person. She had to know that her decision to stand firm against war was going to be met with criticism and ridicule.
One of the wonderful things about digging into research to write posts for Sweethearts of the West is all the fascinating things I learn about our western history. It's great fun.
Thank you for your comment.
I didn't know about this woman, and I found her story fascinating! Lots of info here, Sarah.
ReplyDeleteVicki, I love doing this research for this blog. I find out these interesting facts about history and sometimes, as the case here, I am amazed at what I find.
DeleteThank you for dropping in and commenting.
We need strong women like Jeannette Rankin now. She sets an amazing example for all of us. We owe her and the other women who fought so hard for the rights we take for granted today. Thanks so much for sharing her story with us, Sarah.
ReplyDeleteLet's all exercise our voting rights this year!
I think we're making some headway, Lyn. More and more I see women winning higher offices in government. Still no female president. The English had Thatcher way back in the 80's and several other countries have voted women into their highest office, but us, nada. You'd think we would have led the rest of the world.
DeleteThank you so much for coming by and commenting, Lyn.
Awesome post, Sarah! I love learning about our trailblazing foremothers.
ReplyDeleteTanya, thank you so much for your lovely comment.
Delete